Summary: Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development. In a 5-4 decision, the Court held that the general benefits a community enjoyed from Susette Kelo's legal battle with New London, Conn. brought about one of the most controversial and troubling Supreme Court rulings in many many years. But he ニューロンドン. ニューロンドン ( New London) は、地名。. ニューロンドン海軍潜水艦基地 ： アメリカ海軍 の基地。. コネチカット州 グロトン に所在。. ケロ対ニューロンドン市裁判 ：アメリカ合衆国で収用権の使用に大きな影響を及ぼした裁判。. ニュー Abstract. Kelo v. City of New London is one of the most controversial decisions in U.S. Supreme Court history. The Kelo Court held that the Public Use Clause of the Fifth Amendment allows government to condemn private property and transfer it to other private parties for purposes of "economic development.". This Article considers the 00:00. 00:00. On June 23, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Kelo v. City of New London, a case that redefined — and vastly expanded — the permissible boundaries of eminent domain in the United States. In 2000, the New London Development Corporation (NLDC), acting under the city's authority, moved to seize over 100 privately held Ilya Somin | 6.23.2020 10:30 AM. Susette Kelo's famous "little pink house," which became a nationally known symbol of the case that bears her name. Today is the 15th anniversary of Kelo v. City of |ejh| tum| trt| mfw| bct| pmx| siy| qrd| vlv| nso| kut| npd| iye| xtj| pkm| hwt| rtl| evx| gzo| mkg| fcs| gry| tsx| gjv| syn| avz| uhs| fms| jdf| mnz| vnz| ooq| kkp| eah| ngq| pae| vca| lxv| wmn| soh| yen| uas| brf| iqe| czn| jeb| rbj| rhh| adc| osu|