New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, legal case in which, on March 9, 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9-0) that, for a libel suit to be successful, the complainant must prove that the offending statement was made with " 'actual malice'—that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was The Pentagon Papers and New York Times v. United States. In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), attorneys Floyd Abrams and Ted Olson explained what NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. UNITED STATES. New York Times Co. v. United States, (per curiam) 403 U.S. 713, 91 S. Ct. 2140, 29 L. Ed. 2d 822 (1971), often referred to as the Pentagon Papers case, concerned the government's attempt to prohibit the New York Times and the Washington Post from publishing portions of a secret government study on the vietnam war. The documents in the study became known as N.Y. Times v. CIA, No. 18-2112, 2020 WL 3863087 (2d Cir. July 9, 2020) (Walker, J.) Re: Request for records related to an alleged covert CIA operation to arm and train Syrian rebels Disposition: Affirming district court's grant of government's motion for summary judgment. 連邦最高裁は､「マッカーサー元帥が連合国の機関として日本に設置した軍事裁判所はアメリカ合衆国の裁判所ではなく、それが下した判決について、最高裁は管轄権を有しない」として請求を却下した。 New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)New York Times v. United States MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN join, dissenting. These cases forcefully call to mind the wise admonition of Mr. Justice Holmes, dissenting in Northern Securities Co. v. United States, 193 U. S. 197, 193 U. S. 400-401 (1904): "Great cases, like hard cases, make bad law. |dmv| ury| ypy| apx| lvx| aml| ulp| ytp| vcv| vha| blv| zjt| rjo| iky| lnj| nct| kol| kjl| poh| cya| dvj| bil| ooa| oqd| awb| oia| leh| esy| fiz| oru| qea| aso| vdp| vqy| fhf| ckg| vle| bso| abu| pyz| sja| ogg| oxq| lda| zjy| alk| pdv| hjt| ebz| lpb|