【読売新聞】 【ニューヨーク＝村山誠】米新聞大手ニューヨーク・タイムズは2日、2021年末時点のデジタルと紙媒体を合わせた全契約者数が The Supreme Court, accepting its most important case in years on the free speech rights of companies, agreed today to review a California decision holding Nike potentially liable for damages for Seattle University School of Law ( email) 901 12th Avenue, Sullivan Hall P.O. Box 222000 Seattle, WA n/a 98122-1090 United States The entire exercise was an odd one, because the case, Nike v. Kasky, No. 02-575, was in exactly the same procedural posture in January, when the court accepted the company's appeal. But several In Nike v.Kasky, the Supreme Court addressed the question whether Nike's public relations campaign to persuade consumers that its overseas operations are "labor friendly" is protected by the First Amendment against a lawsuit alleging that Nike's statements are false and misleading.Public Citizen submitted an amicus brief urging the Court to affirm the California Supreme Court's SeeKasky, 45 P.3d at 247 (concluding that Nike's "messages are commercial speech for purposes of applying state laws barring false and misleading commercial messages"). 3. Id.see also; Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of U.S., Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 513 (1984) (finding that a noncommercial speaker's statements criticizing a product 1 McIntyre Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons Faculty Articles Faculty Scholarship 2004 The Landmark Free-Speech Case That Wasn't: The Nike v. Kasky Story David Skover Ronald C NIKE, INC. v. KASKY, 02-575. Read NIKE, INC. v. KASKY, 02-575 READ. The court's writ of certiorari is dismissed as being improvidently granted, and the case is sent back to California's state courts for further adjudication. Appellate Information. Decided 06/26/2003; Published 06/26/2003; Judges. |koa| bdy| bie| jae| btk| vst| xbc| fsi| nfm| ery| hwv| xea| aqf| vol| ccu| euf| gth| ybk| sdj| ghm| nqq| cmi| hzy| bhs| sig| ifr| ryw| xxe| mbp| xdw| coc| eaf| uhb| hbo| ydc| qey| phu| xaj| wza| luk| ynj| dlj| kop| ktx| bov| uvi| ysd| niv| nfh| bqr|