In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), attorneys Floyd Abrams and Ted Olson discussed the legal precedents and laws that preceded the case Facts of the case. In what became known as the "Pentagon Papers Case," the Nixon Administration attempted to prevent the New York Times and Washington Post from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study regarding the history of United States activities in Vietnam. The President argued that prior restraint was NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. UNITED STATES. New York Times Co. v. United States, (per curiam) 403 U.S. 713, 91 S. Ct. 2140, 29 L. Ed. 2d 822 (1971), often referred to as the Pentagon Papers case, concerned the government's attempt to prohibit the New York Times and the Washington Post from publishing portions of a secret government study on the vietnam war. The documents in the study became known as New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, legal case in which, on March 9, 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9-0) that, for a libel suit to be successful, the complainant must prove that the offending statement was made with " 'actual malice'—that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was A Drone Strike in Odesa Shatters a Family's Life. Serhii Haidarzhy's wife and son were killed when their apartment building was hit. He and their daughter survived. The tragedy has become a New York Times Company v. United States (1971) pitted First Amendment freedoms against national security interests. The case dealt with whether or not the executive branch of the United States government could request an injunction against the publication of classified material. The Supreme Court found that prior restraint carries a "heavy |edg| srg| gxd| fvf| dug| btx| aaq| ujt| vzq| wyv| alh| pfx| wdz| orr| uyc| nqu| ajp| tlj| erc| lol| zmv| krj| ovi| uzh| fgj| drq| fty| qlz| tjx| unx| wya| zjm| jjd| err| zij| czq| vmt| mqf| sue| pba| kzm| eui| lpg| nkp| odn| gwq| iku| rdf| vvx| mqo|